When Rikus Badenhorst, Chair of the Select Committee on Public Infrastructure and a Democratic Alliance MP, urged Transport Minister Barbara Creecy to set a firm timetable for a digital driving licence in South Africa, the Department of Transport faced mounting criticism over its aging card‑printing system.
The idea of an electronic driver’s licence (EDL) isn’t new. Back in 2022, former transport minister Fikile Mbalula announced that a fully digital licence would be live by March 2025. That deadline slipped, and no concrete rollout has materialised.
Since the 2022/23 fiscal year, the Select Committee on Public Infrastructure has been tracking every promise the government makes about digital licences. Their ledger shows three major policy drafts, two tender investigations, and a string of parliamentary questions that have yet to be answered.
The existing system relies on a card‑printing machine that’s more than 25 years old. Frequent breakdowns mean "hundreds of thousands of cards" sit in limbo, and the backlog is costing the state billions of rands in administrative overhead.
Badenhorst warned that drivers often wait weeks for their physical licence, while the machines sit idle in basements across the country. "It is beyond me that we cannot introduce a digital driver’s licence which could be held on a cell phone and which could be operationalised," he said during a September 8 interview with TechCentral.
During the September 8 session, Badenhorst pressed Creecy for a "definitive timeline"—a commitment he says should be locked in within the next four years. He cited successful digital transformations elsewhere: the South African Revenue Service has gone fully digital, and Home Affairs is rolling out a biometric ID system.
"Why must we now wait in the transport department? The card machine is so yesterday and is something that sits in a basement somewhere and costs us billions," Badenhorst argued, drawing a direct line between past successes and the current impasse.
Minister Creecy, for her part, said the delay stems from an ongoing probe into irregularities surrounding the tender for a new card‑printing machine. Findings from that investigation, she promised, will shape the next policy on digital licences.
Even as the digital licence debate rages, the Department of Transport announced a separate set of reforms slated for October 2025. Drivers will need to pre‑register on an online portal before stepping foot in a licensing centre. The move aims to shave weeks off the queue and streamline document verification.
Another tweak: the licence validity period will stretch from five to eight years for drivers under 65. Those over 65 will still renew every five years because of medical‑check requirements.
Physical licences will also gain new security features, including integrated biometric data—an effort to curb fraud and make counterfeit cards harder to produce.
Technology commentator Arthur Goldstuck, appearing on an SABC News segment on September 15, warned that South Africa’s current infrastructure might not yet support a nation‑wide digital licence rollout. He pointed to limited broadband penetration in rural areas and the need for robust encryption standards.
Still, Goldstuck noted that other African nations have successfully piloted mobile‑based ID solutions, suggesting a phased approach could work here. "If the state can get the biometric ID cards right, extending that trust framework to a digital licence isn’t a huge leap," he offered.
Industry insiders say the biggest hurdle is not technology but policy alignment. The tender probe has stalled procurement of a modern printer, and without a clear procurement roadmap, a digital system will lack the fallback physical infrastructure many officials still rely on.
If the committee secures a firm timeline, drivers could see their licences appear on smartphones within the next two years—a shift that would align South Africa with a growing global trend toward mobile credentials.
On the flip side, a rushed rollout without adequate security testing could open doors to digital fraud, a risk the Department is eager to avoid given recent spikes in licence‑related scams.
For now, the ball sits in Creecy’s court. The next parliamentary sitting in early 2026 will likely feature an update on the tender investigation, and watchdog groups are already preparing a set of recommendations to ensure any digital licence system meets international security standards.
Drivers could store their licence on a smartphone, eliminating the need to carry a physical card. This would cut waiting times at licensing centres and make renewals as simple as a few taps, provided they have internet access and a compatible device.
A digital licence must be encrypted and linked to biometric data to prevent cloning. Experts warn that without robust encryption and a reliable authentication method, hackers could potentially forge or tamper with credentials, especially in areas with weak network security.
Yes, from October 2025 drivers will need to complete a pre‑registration step on the Department’s portal before visiting a licensing centre. The move is intended to streamline document checks and reduce in‑person queues.
Extending the validity to eight years for drivers under 65 means fewer renewals and lower administrative costs. It also aligns South Africa with many OECD countries that use similar licence life‑spans.
The parliamentary committee aims to secure a definitive ministerial commitment by early 2026. If the plan proceeds on schedule, a pilot could launch in 2027 with nationwide availability by 2029.
Honestly, the whole digital licence fiasco is a textbook case of governmental incompetence 🤦♂️. The committee keeps rattling the same old promises while the machines rust in basements, and the public pays the price. If the Transport Minister can't even set a simple timetable, how are we supposed to trust any digital transformation? This is why I avoid any official process unless absolutely necessary. 😂
Oh sure, because the deep state is definitely hiding the digital licence tech in some secret bunker 😏. Maybe the machines are actually spying on us, which is why they’re stuck in basements. Anyway, enjoy your crusade, it’s entertaining. 😜
The persistent lag in implementing an electronic driver’s licence (EDL) underscores a systemic failure of project governance within the Department of Transport. A critical path analysis reveals that the tender investigation has become the principal bottleneck, effectively freezing any procurement activities. Stakeholder alignment, particularly between the legislative oversight committee and the executive branch, remains inadequate, leading to fragmented decision‑making. Moreover, the absence of a robust change‑management framework exacerbates resistance from legacy system custodians. The current reliance on a quarter‑century‑old card printer violates best‑practice asset lifecycle policies and inflates operational expenditure. Financial modeling indicates that the projected R1.2 billion annual downtime could be reallocated towards scalable cloud infrastructure for the EDL. Cyber‑risk assessments further suggest that a phased rollout, commencing with pilot municipalities, would mitigate exposure to credential‑theft vectors. Integration with existing biometric ID systems, as cited by the Home Affairs rollout, offers a viable authentication backbone, provided data encryption adheres to NIST standards. Rural broadband penetration, however, remains a limiting factor, necessitating hybrid offline verification mechanisms. The committee’s ledger of unanswered parliamentary questions reflects a transparency deficit that erodes public trust. Budgetary allocations for the digital transition must be insulated from political fluctuations to ensure continuity. Inter‑agency collaboration, especially with SARS’s digital platforms, could yield economies of scale in user onboarding. Documentation of tender irregularities should be expedited to clear the procurement pipeline. The projected timeline of a pilot in 2027 aligns with international benchmarks for similar e‑credential initiatives. Stakeholder communication strategies must incorporate user education to prevent adoption friction. Ultimately, without decisive ministerial commitment by early 2026, the digital licence agenda risks stagnation, perpetuating the status quo of elongated wait times and inflated costs.
Honestly, the whole thing is just another excuse to waste taxpayers money.
I get where you're coming from, but we should also consider that the department might be juggling multiple priorities. A constructive dialogue could help push for a realistic timeline rather than just criticizing.
While the criticism is warranted, let's not forget that the Department of Transport is also dealing with legacy infrastructure constraints. Upgrading the card‑printing hardware alone won't magically solve the digital licence issue; a comprehensive system redesign is needed. The upcoming pre‑registration portal could at least alleviate some of the backlog, even if the full EDL is still years away.
Looks like another political circus.
The push for an extended licence validity to eight years is actually a smart move, especially for drivers under 65. Fewer renewals mean less administrative hassle and lower costs in the long run. However, we must ensure that the biometric data integration doesn't become a privacy nightmare. Balancing convenience with security is the key challenge here.
Privacy? More like a government back‑door waiting to happen, right?
Don't be fooled, the real agenda is to create a digital identity network that tracks every move you make. Once your licence is on your phone, they're basically holding your location data on a silver platter. This is exactly how the New World Order rolls out its surveillance state.
Hey folks, I think it's cool that they're finally looking at digital licences. It could really cut down on those endless trips to the licensing centre. Let's hope they sort out the security bits properly.
Oh wonderful, another "revolutionary" system that will "fix" everything… 🙄. As if adding more tech automatically solves deep‑seated bureaucratic inefficiencies!!!
Good points, everyone! 👍
Thank you for your concise contribution. While brevity is appreciated, a more detailed exposition on the practical implications of the proposed digital licence framework would be beneficial for a comprehensive discourse.
I agree with the need for careful implementation; rushing could create more problems than it solves.
Write a comment